Even shoot-at-sight order is not going to stop nepalese from protestiing against the king. BBC says there were AT LEAST 100,000 people in the protest rally in spite of the curfew. What do the royalists who do not believe nepali media have to say about this?

read : http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4927556.stm

CNN says there were 115,000 demonstrators:

Police, wearing full body armor and carrying shields, estimated there were as many as 115,000 demonstrators surrounding the capital, shouting slogans and chafing at the government restrictions. Police were ordered to shoot anyone trying to enter the capital.

source: http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/04/20/nepal/index.html

So what more independent media do royalists want now?

i was just watching the news, 13 nepalis have died because they were outside on the streets on curfew or something.... geez, how would this help anything become normal..

The king must abdicate. it is as simple as that

Now, Royalists may start to say, CNN is biase towards them.

.and bbc. and ap.

."The nearly two dozen demonstrations, which brought as many as 100,000 people into the streets around the capital Katmandu, ranged from festive pro-democracy rallies to angry riots of young men who lit bonfires and hurled bricks at police. Some demanded the death of the king, whose government appears increasingly unable to control the country."

http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/N/NEPAL?SITE=MIBAX&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT